Naturalists, Experts Evaluate Land Swap Property
The Connecticut Botanical Society, along with independent botanists and naturalist experts, surveyed the 17-acre property on Saturday.
The Connecticut Botanical Society conducted a site walk on Saturday in conjunction with the Citizens for the Protection of Public Land to evaluate the property involved in the controversial proposed land swap deal in Haddam. The 17.4-acre parcel, located adjacent to the Eagle Landing State Park, is known as the Clark Creek Wildlife Management Area.
Botanists, naturalists and other concerned citizens toured the property with cameras, guidebooks and notebooks in hand to identify and record the plants, birds, butterflies and invertebrates that consider the property home.
Martha McLaud Tonucci, past president of the CT Botanical Society and current member of the East Haddam Land Trust, led the site walk.
“We are trying to emphasize that this property is not a ‘wasteland’ or ‘sand pit,’ but a vanishing habitat,”, she said. “The development of this property, for example, could have an extraordinary implication for birds. This is currently a pristine bird habitat.”
Judy Preston, of the Tidewater Institute in Old Saybrook, is an ecologist concerned with conservation issues in the lower Connecticut River Estuary. Preston felt that the active participation of citizens in the site walk was representative of “everyone coming together and recognizing the importance of this space.”
Charlotte Pyle, of Storrs, and Pat Bresnahan, Associate Director of the CT Institute of Water Resources, participated in the identification process with field guidebooks in hand.
“I feel that this area is an interesting place because there is little open space, especially for birds,” Pyle said. “Additionally, the shrubs and low-growing plants are perfect habitats for wildlife and insects.”
Participants in the site walk gathered at the crest of the property in a wooded spot to air their concerns over the potential development of the property.
Homeowners like Richard Bellemare are concerned that the development of the 17.4-acre parcel would lead to additional drainage problems in the area. Bellemare’s cottage is located next to Eagle Landing and he feels that drainage from a development would add to the “waterflow that invades our property.”
John Priontkowski, of the East Haddam Land Trust, spoke openly about his concerns regarding potential additional traffic to the area and the costs that would be incurred by residents if the parcel were to be developed. For example, he argued, there would be additional costs for the taxpayers to get water from the reservoir to the site if it were developed as proposed.
In an earlier interview, the CT Rivershed Council came out in opposition to the swap.
“We are deeply concerned about the precedent that handing over land intended for conservation to a private developer would set,” Jacqueline Talbot said. “It is important to consider land proximal to the Connecticut River very carefully, and we feel that there are multiple concrete reasons to look at this much more carefully."
The issue, meanwhile, is starting to attract attention outside of the region and the state. The Boston Globe this week wrote this story about the issue.
The experts for the site walk were called in by Citizens for Protection of Public Land with the goal to help counter assertions by some who support the swap and say the land has numerous invasive species and does not represent a sensitive conservation area.
The land swap calls for trading the 17.4 acres in Tylerville for 87 acres of woodlands that abut theCockaponset State Forest in Higganum. It is being sought, and backed by state Sen. Eileen Daily, D-Westbrook, so that the developers of the Riverhouse at Goodspeed Station can build retail and other businesses that would complement their banquet facility, which abuts the land.
Melissa Schlag
10:45 am on Sunday, May 22, 2011
I just want to clarify that the Connecticut Botanical Society offered to come do the site walk of the Clark Creek Wildlife Management Area.
And I want to thank Martha and all the botanists for their generous offer and all their efforts yesterday!
A great big thank you from the Citizens for Protection of Public Land.
Gene Bartholomew
12:37 pm on Sunday, May 22, 2011
What do you need experts or naturlaists for??? Daily and the developers have already decided how it shall be----sarcasm
Marcia Hess
2:26 pm on Sunday, May 22, 2011
CT taxpayers, this is not just a Haddam issue. Please join our effort to prevent the Clark Creek Wildlife Management Area to be swapped away via SB1196; Section 10 in particular! I read one article which suggested that those who oppose this are "some Haddam residents." The article above notes how far reaching these concerns go.
Melissa Schlag
8:34 pm on Sunday, May 22, 2011
The petitions yesterday collected 178 names from people all over the state.
THIRTY SEVEN different towns were represented.
One even from New Jersey...
This is a state issue, not just a Haddam one.
Gene Bartholomew
8:01 am on Monday, May 23, 2011
That's what I've been saying since the gitgo, take it out of Haddam, its what Daily wanted, keep it local, out of scutiny, its really a national issue, if this goes through the ramifications could be staggering. It could be used as a legal precedent by developers in court across the nation.
That's why I have been hammering on the legal precedent issue.
For those on the fence or for this, consider the source, Daily says everything will be wonderful, it will do amazing things for the local economy. Consider the source, this is the same person that said electric de regulation would lower prices and be wonderful, this is the same person that likes to paint a rosy picture from Hartford while they shovel our money out the back door and go "ooops, guess the only solution is to raise your taxes" while they give UTC and Pfizer and others hundreds of millions.
Consider the source. Riverhouse is under the delusion that they are Goodspeed Station, when the real station is sitting across the street, what does that say about their grasp on reality?? I think that is about one of the most arrogant things I have ever seen anyone do or say. That would be like La Vita Gustosa saying "we're Gelston House". I don't know what to make of that, I find it very very odd.