Haddam Land Swap Appraisals: Not Equal
DEEP vows the transaction will not move forward if a "package of land and/or money" to equalize the swap is not offered.
The official appraisals on the two parcels involved in the controversial Haddam land swap are in. As of Monday morning, the specific details, however, had not been released by the state. A report by the Hartford Courant is speculating that the difference between the parcels is about $1 million.
The issue of the value of both properties has become central to the land swap controversy because Connecticut law requires that any state land involved in a swap be of greater or equal value to the property for which it would be traded.
Dennis Schain, communications director for the state's Department of Energy and Environmental Protection, said today that "the public act authorizing this and DEEP’s policies require that any swap be for lands of equal value. We will not deviate from that standard. If a package of land and/or money determined to be of equal value to the state-owned land is not offered this transaction will not move forward.”
Dwayne Gardner, a spokesman for the DEEP, said the agency can not release the appraisals, or detailis of them, because it still in the process of trying to swap the state land for the Higganum parcel.
“I can say that the land being offered to the state in exchange for the state property along the CT River has been appraised at a dollar amount lower than the state property.”
According to an earlier report, the 17.4 acre plot of land in Tylerville, which overlooks the Connecticut River across from the Goodspeed Opera House, was assessed back in 2009 at $1,088,500. During a revaluation of all properties in 2010, however, the new assessment was set at $120,000.
When residents brought that figure to the attention of Assessor Marilyn R. Baumann last year to question the dramatic decrease, Baumann said the new assessment was wrong and was the result of a clerical error. A review of the property followed, and the new assessment was re-set at $300,540.
While the river land’s assessment is greater than the developer-owned Higganum land, the second property in the land swap proposal, it still represents a more than 70 percent decrease in assessed value in one year. The town's revised assessment also brought the river land’s value much closer to that of the 87 acres in Higganum. The Higganum property was last assessed at $226,900.
Vision Appraisal Technology of Northborough, Mass. assessed the two properties. The company oversees assessment data collection for many Connecticut towns.
According to the last public appraisals, the difference in property value would be under $80,000. If speculation is correct, the most recent evaluations might reflect a value difference of around $1 million.
“We hope to resolve this issue soon in the manner most beneficial to state residents. At that time we will also be able to fully disclose the land appraisal value and the resolution agreed to by the state and by the owner,” Gardner says.
The Riverhouse owners have proposed using the 17.8 acres, which abut their banquet facility property, to build a boutique hotel and associated retail space. The plan, they said, would augment their business and boost the town’s economy.
Opponents, however, have decried the idea and have questioned its economic benefits. They also have said swapping state-owned land would set a dangerous precedent for other potential land sales or donations Connecticut residents might make.
prkrsttn
3:39 pm on Monday, January 23, 2012
What kind of fools does Eileen Daily think the people of Connecticut are? This is a shame, shame, shame! Stop this travesty now and give us back OUR land. The deal smelled fishy when it first was proposed. It's now even fishier, and the smell ain't coming from the river.
Keep the river front for all of us
3:50 pm on Monday, January 23, 2012
Why should the dealings of the DEEP...........be kept from the public? Are they trying to find appraiser who will come up with the "figures they want for a match " ???? This whole situation is getting "DEEP-er and DEEP-er".
HaJo
4:53 pm on Monday, January 23, 2012
Ridiculous! Who's getting paid off to let this travesty of injustice proceed? What will it take to convince the state government that they made a mistake approving this swap?
sharon botelle
8:54 pm on Monday, January 23, 2012
Eileen Daily and Steve Rocco said on many occassions that if the land values were not equal, the swap wouldn't happen. So what is there to negotiate? Perhaps they should be asked to explain...
River ethics
4:03 am on Tuesday, January 24, 2012
I have mixed feelings on this. If the land swap does not finalize, Daly could save face by claiming she could not have anticipated how unequal the appraised values of both parcels were.... as opposed to the fact that it was special interest and favor serving that motivated this from the outset and should have never been approved in the first place.
**Having said that, is it still in the hands of the Property Review Board? Can the Board send it back to the legislative body pointing out that it is no longer a swap, but a sale of state land, and now they are, in essence, negotiating a SALE.
Jen Rice
6:40 am on Tuesday, January 24, 2012
as the worms turn from our town hall all the way to DEEP and the Gov office ! what a shame isn't there an honest person among the group to put a stop to what is going on with the land swap? may i say do the right thing it wont hurt, not for even a minute.
Keep the river front for all of us
6:56 am on Tuesday, January 24, 2012
Ummmmmmmm, $1 million dollar difference.........no way Rocco will end up having to actually PAY something for this property. The good old town of Haddam will probably give him MORE tax breaks to make up for it.........there goes more coming out of OUR pockets again.............higher taxes for you and me.
Jeanne Corvan
11:50 am on Tuesday, January 24, 2012
I recall that at the time the swap bill was being debated, everyone supporting it bent over backwards to say that both pieces were priced the same. Anyone would know right off the bat that was false. They presumed that when the appraisals came out, all those opposed to the swap would have long gone away. But they didn't. Sorry.
The shifitng of value of the 17 acres, purchased at over 1mil, then appraised at 120 K, then whoops, mistake, we meant 300 K. And now this secret business going on. This stinks. Where are the legislators who opposed the swap. Why are they not condeming this and calling for releasing the appraisals and more importantly, publicizing the deals that are being made by the state to insure this swap goes thru. This whole business is a moral stain on the administration and all its supporters in Hartford. Shame. I truly hope someone with courage will speak up and this whole ugly business will unravel in full view.